Monday, October 29, 2012

Sarah's Financial Arrested Development Week 07 - Journal Review


Financial Arrested Development

After pulling a brain-muscle trying to wrap my head around Annual Statements, Financial Analysis and Enron, I emerged victorious, feeling a bit smarter, and at the same time flabbergasted!  The fact that Enron was able to conceal billions of dollars in debt and simply claim that like Coca-cola’s famous secret recipe, they simply did not share their business models - although being a publically traded company - is ridiculous.  As McLean stated, the fact that the company was so opaque was a huge red flag being waved furiously at the investors.  At the time I can only guess that people were willing to suspend certain warning signs, hoping to earn quick dollars and many of them did - both. 

Photo by Protohiro

The biggest change in perspective happened for me when Allen pointed out that Enron was one of the largest negatives in the country’s history, but also that the only place to go then was up.  He discussed how the Enron scandal reformed the financial reporting to be more immediate, more transparent. He mentioned that companies now are forced to do more relational marketing to regain consumer trust.  It remains to be seen if the people involved learned anything, but the people who were burned and those that witnessed it definitely did.

It also made me consider my arrested development with finances in that I never would have been smart enough to pull something like that off as numbers make my vision go blurry.  I wondered if there were other smaller companies who either a) truly don’t know how to balance a checkbook and always got by well enough until now or b) are not responsible to shareholders so they get as creative with their books as they want. The journal I chose to review was Private Company Due Diligence which not only identifies 5 different but very common financial issues, but also their suggestion for how to turn things around from the perspective of a potential company looking to buy such smaller companies. 

The Bluth family is the best example of the worst small-company practices.
 The most common themes reveal lack of structure and rules. This defines the first three issues in one.  In privately-held companies where 1) they make up the rules as they go along, they may 2) lack the structure to know who is eligible for what benefit, and 3) who enforces the rules and manages the money, and at the same time making decisions. 4) involves bad decisions such as putting value on inventory to reduce the amount of income taxes owed (Cohen, Kwestel, Freemen & Thornton, 2011) or 5) using too many deductions.

Sadly the decision on how to fix these often involves getting rid of the long-time employees who only “do things the way they’ve always been done” and undermine the efforts of the new higher-ups. Then, the other is to know your tax systems, create financial plans and be consistent when enforcing them. You can’t bend the rules for yourself when you are not allowed to for others. 

Despite my own financial arrested development, it’s taught me that tightening up and great attention to financial detail are empowering and it’s never too late to make a positive change. 

References:

Allen, C. (2002) Building Mountains in a Flat Landscape: Investor Relations in the post-Enron
  Era, Corporate Communications: An International Journal, Volume 7 (2), pp. 206-211.
  Retrieved from: http://libproxy.usc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com.libproxy.usc.edu/
  url=http://search.proquest.com.libproxy.usc.edu/docview/903804543?accountid=14749

Cohen, C., Kwestel, M,, Freeman, T., Thornton, G. (2011, Nov). Private Company Due Diligence Mergers and Acquisitions, 46(11), 42-43.

McLean, B., (2006, January 19). Is Enron Overpriced? Retrieved July 22, 2011, from
  http://money.cnn.com/2006/01/13/news/companies/enronoriginal_fortune/index.htm

Peavier, R. (n.d.) Top 10 Financial Events of the Decade, About.com Guide. Retrieved
  from: http://bizfinance.about.com/od/currentevents/tp/Top_Ten_Fin_Events_Decade.htm

4 comments:

  1. Hi Sarah,

    The Enron situation surprised me as well. I guess people were just not really ready to accept the reality of it and were comfortable with not asking questions. I enjoyed the highlights from the article you read. I found it very interesting how lack of structure was a central theme.

    Good piece!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Do they give a sense of Why smaller private companies tend to have bad practices? Are there any systemic reasons why they can operate as they do? Is regulation the answer?

    ReplyDelete
  3. Brad:
    Yes, they said many of these start ups and personal businesses are started with small investments. When the business grows and experiences growing pains while the company could use an overhaul, perhaps a few more support staff, faster and more efficient computer systems to also provide better inventory and financial reports, the whole idea sounds too costly and the idea of making and selling more product wins. From experience, having witnessed such companies, it is a gamble knowing when to staff up hoping for a surge in business or a big job to come through instead of knowing when the income has afforded them more people to improve the headcount and supporting structure. Owners have a tendency to treat the business bank account as their personal check book, not always from a greedy perspective, more they've put their whole lives into seeing this succeed and the lines between business and personal get blurred when you're trying to stay afloat.

    Melinda, I'd say that lack of structure is one way for us outsiders (and Masters' students) to look at it, but truthfully, when one owns a small business it's called "flying by the seat of your pants" and "doing whatever it takes."

    Thanks for the comments!

    ReplyDelete
  4. Sarah,

    I think you hit the nail on the head in your response to Brad's question. Too often, when companies start out small and grow into larger companies, the one area that does not keep pace with their growth is the mental attitude that they are no longer a small company. I have a friend who is working for just such a company now. They are still privately held, but they operate as if they were much smaller than they actually are. Apparently, they have an offsite storage facility where they keep all of their unused assets such as desks, filing cabinets, etc. Do you know that the head of the company expects the administrative staff to use their own vehicles to go pick up such pieces and bring them back to the office? Can you say "workers comp claim"? They are just asking to have a lawsuit brought against them for violation of I don't know how many employment laws.

    You're right, it is a gamble to know when to staff up. But after watching your business continue to grow year after year, I think it's safe to hire a moving company to pick up and deliver furniture, don't you?

    Very interesting piece :-).

    K

    ReplyDelete