I drafted a letter to my CEO to consider developing strategic
communication strategies. The letter is not about particular strategies, but an
effort to give strategic communication relevance.
As a disclaimer, my CEO is an extremely
talented professional and the agency’s growing success is a testament to that.
However, it is no secret to the employees and clients alike are extremely
frustrated with organizational communication.
To my favorite CEO,
First of all, I’d like to address the fact that you do an excellent job keeping employees and clients
up to date on our role in the current socio-political field of Autism spectrum
disabilities. Research indicates that as social expectations change, it affects
business (Bonini, Mendonca, & Oppenheim, 2006). As the perceptions of the
capabilities of a person with Autism has changed over the last 15 years, you
have continued to increase services respectively to meet both the needs and
expectations of affected individuals. Keeping us up to date on potential public
funding changes and the political context helps us strategically determine the
agencies next steps. Because of your personal attention to these issues, this
awareness is rooted in the culture of our agency (Bonini, Mendonca, &
Oppenheim, 2006).
As the agency CEO, I would like to
bring to your attention the concern of quality strategic communication. As you
already know, employees in our agency and often struggle with communication and
clients tend to complain about inconsistencies of messages. Although we
continue to thrive as a successful organization, it is important to address
this issue so we can take advantage of future opportunities for growth that may
require well-established communication strategies (Argenti, Howell, & Beck,
2005). I’d like to provide you some insights that may start the ball rolling on
strategic communication for the organization.
Perhaps first we might delve into a
little bit of philosophy on communication. You and I agree that all actions are
potentially communicative (Eisenberg, 1984). In our field, we often emphasis
this when the question rises if people with Autism can communicate. Although
their attempts to communicate can be unclear, one could argue that context,
such as present and pre-existing knowledge, in which they do attempt, is how we
determine what the person is saying. This context is pivotal to determine the
meaning of their communication. The person may have a very clear message to
say, but does not possess the relational channels to express it. Likewise, when
we consider the information we want to communicate as an organization, we must
consider the present and pre-existing knowledge of constituents. Considering
this, we must understand that clarity is not the message itself, but a function
of how present the message and how constituents understand the message
(Eisenberg, 1984; Goodall, Trethewey, McDonald, 2006).
When considering how we will
present the message, we will benefit from thinking in terms of strategic
communication. Strategic communication is the method of communication that paves
the way for us to take full advantage of our organizational strategies that are
in place to meet our goals. When we talk about strategic communication it is
basically the planning of how to send clear and consistent messages. It may
require choosing the channels that are most effective for particular
constituents and consistently manipulating only those selected channels.
Strategic communication means thoughtful simplification. This means using
technical language only when necessary, and while keeping message concise,
being sure we include all necessary information. For example, e-mails that are
written like “Take minutes. Bookstore? Tonight’s no good” is too simplified.
The message would be better written, “I have three unrelated things to tell
you. 1. Take minutes at 10/16/12 meeting. 2. Did you follow up with the
bookstore rep and was she open to the offer? 3. I will need to reschedule our
session tonight”. And although I know you think it’s a waste of time, strategic
communication involves repetition. When we want to send a message to our
clients, we must take the time to e-mail, post on Facebook, on tumbler, and
having the exact same message on our website. This will eliminate a lot of
confusion from our constituents. (Argenti, Howell, & Beck, 2005).
For now, picture yourself as the
“strategic communications officer” or for our purposes, the strategic communication interventionist (Argenti,
Howell, & Beck, 2005). Envision yourself as the one who sets the standard
for the quality of our communication and teaches it to the agency. It’s like a
behavior intervention style for a particular client. As the behavior
interventionist integrates a behavior intervention throughout all the aspects
of the client’s life, you must seek to integrate consistent communication
throughout all aspects of our organization. Like we seek a balance for our
clients, n we should strive to “speak in harmony” as an organization (Argenti,
Howell, & Beck, 2005).
I look forward to going into detail with you about our next
steps to accomplish this objective.
Hi, Ashley:
ReplyDeleteFirst, I commend you on a VERY creative blog post! LOVE it!
From reading this, it appears that your organization does a great job communicating with your clients in a way that is meaningful and understood. But the consistency of the message (on various platforms like, FB and tumbler) is absent. Do you have someone in your organization that has responsibility for this?
This week's readings spoke a lot about the success of "ambiguous" communication strategies. Is this something that your company employs?
Thanks Tara!
ReplyDeleteYou know i wanted to incorporate more on the success ambiguous strategies and originally set out with that intention. However, as I was trying to promote clarity of communication, I realized that while ambiguity can serve to promote clarity, I think it can also confuse people like my CEO - as she is not a communications expert, it would require a lot of background on what is strategic ambiguity and how to use it effectively. The intention of this message, however, was to state that current communication is too "ambiguous". I think the next step would be discussing with her how to use ambiguity strategically. Thanks for your input!
Also, we don't have someone who is responsible for our message mediums. I WISH we did, but as funding is tight, that is not a priority. The idea is that it is a "group effort" but as you can imagine, with diffused responsibility comes diffused attention to the matter. People often forget, or simply don't have the time to make it a priority, although there are a few of us that do really strive for it.