Why would
a credit card company and Foursquare, a social media outlet, join forces?
It seems like an unlikely couple, right? Ahh…but at closer glance, this
seemingly “odd couple” could just be the next big thing in partnerships.
We’re all
familiar with American Express, right? A
160-year old company, the “world’s most trusted brand” and the “world’s largest
card issuer by purchase volume.” But what is Foursquare? Foursquare
is a free app that lets your network of friends know where you are by checking
into locations or businesses. Launched in March 2009 by Dennis Crowly and
Naveen Selvadurai, the company has grown to 25 million users worldwide with
over 100 employees as of September, 2012. Now you have the “411” on the companies,
so why are they partnering?
Why
partner?
“Andrews
(1971) claimed that the strategic actions of firms are the outcome of a match
between a firm’s existing competence and the availability of new opportunities”
(Gulati, p. 294). If you take a look at
how social media has changed the face of business and customer interaction, it
is easy to see why companies want in on the action. According to a Fast Company article by F.
Manjoo (2011), companies are “feverishly working to get consumers to ‘engage’”
on social media platforms and they’re spending the money to do it. “According
to BIA/Kelsey, a media consulting firm, companies spent about $2.1 billion on
social-media advertising in 2010; the number is projected to grow to nearly $8
billion in 2015” (Manjoo, 2011).
What’s in
it for American Express?
This partnership with Foursquare also gives Amex access to
more tech-savvy customers. “AmEx
customers rang up roughly $100 billion in online transactions last year, and
the company's online spending is growing at a rate of 20% versus 15% for its
overall spending.” (Raice, 2011).
Amex can increase its response rates on merchant offers. As
“American Express Vice Chairman Edward Gilligan told the New York Times,
‘Foursquare offers brought a higher response rate than anything else we’re
doing.’” (Thompson, 2011).
Here’s how it works:
- link your AmEx and foursquare accounts;
- check in at a participating store and tap ‘load to card’ on the Special; and,
- pay with your AmEx card.
There’s no cutting out coupons or showing your phone
to the cashier. The savings are automatically credited to your account within a
few days.
So the big push for Amex to join
forces with Foursquare has nothing to do with financial gain. It’s about being
where customers are and engaging with tech-savvy customers. And, as Gulati
(1998) points out, conditions of mutual economic advantage are necessary but
not sufficient conditions for the formation of an alliance (Gulati, p. 301).
What’s in
it for Foursquare?
The element of trust also plays into the partnership’s
attractiveness. This partnership mirrors Sabel’s definition of trust, “mutual
confidence that no party to an exchange will exploit another’s vulnerabilities”
(Barney & Hansen, 1994). What does Foursquare have to lose in this
agreement, really? Amex has a proven track record of success, a great
reputation, and an extensive network. How or in what way would Amex exploit
Foursquare’s vulnerabilities? And, why would they? What’s the point? Amex
wouldn’t tarnish their reputation in the marketplace. So, from Foursquare’s
point of view, the partnership could
be seen as “weak form trust” where exchange vulnerabilities do not exist (Barney
& Hansen, 1994). Although, I doubt
the two companies created a partnership without some form of governance because
in this day an age governance of agreements is more than just a simple “hand
shake.”
The Amex / Foursquare
partnership is one of collaboration where each partner “value[s] the skills
each brings to the alliance.” Sure, they are each getting something from each
other as part of an exchange: Amex gets access to customers and can engage with
them on an interactive platform; Foursquare gets validity of its
product/service offering and potential access to Amex extensive network. But,
at closer examination, this alliance is one of collaboration and fated for
future success.
Using the “Eight I’s That
Create Successful We’s” criteria for successful partnerships, Amex/ Foursquare
passes with straight “A’s” (Kanter, p. 100):
|
A
|
Individual Excellence – both companies have entered into the alliance
with positive motives
|
|
A
|
Interdependence – both companies have “complimentary skills” and
need each other to accomplish their objectives
|
|
A
|
Information – it appears that both companies are communicating
openly as
their agreement is still in
place
|
|
A
|
Integration – both companies are “teachers and learners” integrating
their specific skill set knowledge (social media and partnership experience)
|
|
A
|
Institutionalization – the Amex / Foursquare
relationship appears to be “formal with clear responsibilities and decision
processes” that “cannot be broken on a whim.”
|
|
A
|
Integrity – both
parties appear to have mutual trust.
|
This seemingly “odd couple”
has clearly made a case for partnerships and is still going strong.
References
Barney & Hansen, (1994). "Trustworthiness as a
source of competitive advantage."
Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 15,
pp. 175-190.
Carr, A. (2011, June 23) With AmEx Partnership, Foursquare May Prove
Social
Media's Real ROI. Fast Company. Retrieved on Oct. 6, 2012.
http://www.fastcompany.com/1762726/amex-partnership-foursquare-may-
prove-social-medias-real-roi
Gulati, R. (1998)
Alliances and Networks. Strategic
Management Journal. Vol. 19,
p. 293-317).
Kanter, R. (2010). Collaborative advantage: The art of alliances.
Harvard Business
Review. pp. 1-16.
Manjoo, F. (2011, June 22)
Does social media have a return on investment? Fast
Company.
Retrieved on Oct. 6, 2012. http://www.fastcompany.com/1760849/
does-social-media-have-return-investment
Hi Tara.. liked your post. From personal experience, I can add that our company is a big fan of social media and keeps a Facebook page and twitter page and insists its employees do too. In fact, in our annual review, using social media is one of the matricies on which we are judged.
ReplyDeleteIt is a great idea in that it gets your product in front of a lot of people who otherwise might not think about you. And Amex gets the glow of Foursquare, positions itself as being current with social trends.
The only downside I see is what if Foursquare goes the way of MySpace and is replaced by soemthing more attractive (just as FB replaced MySpace). Is American Express stuck with them in a long-term agreement and does that agreement preclude them from partnering with other social media ( I dont think it would).
A risk on the other end is what if one of the social media companies partnered with a financial institution that quickly lost prestige (As Bank of America, Chase, Wamu did following the real estate crash). I guess there would be a clause to get out but by then, you are already linked with them in your in the customers mind.
Best,
John
Hey Tara,
ReplyDeleteGreat post! After reading the article you also sent me about wifi signals and credit cards, do you think these partnerships with social media are too invasaive? Everday in the news you hear about another scam where someone figured out how to break into a website or scam your credit card information. Do you think partnerships between credit card companies and social media make users uneasy and feel like their private information is not as secure?
I also wonder if the older generation feels left behind since they (typically) are not linked in to social media, but still use Amex. This group in particular is who I'm thinking of would have problems with a social media site having access to personal information.
I checked all my credit cards by the way for the wifi signal...
Reply to Melanie Lawson:
DeleteI think social media gets a bad rap. Individuals "choose" to be on these sites and "choose" to share information to the public online. There are measures in place by these platforms to protect customers; however, it is also the users responsibility to protect him/herself. As an Amex card holder, I know that they have very strict measure in place to protect customers from fraud. So, Foursquare partnering with a trusted brand with a history of taking "extra" care of its customers with regard to fradulent practices was brilliant. The point of the partnership was for Amex to "communicate" with its customers and have a relationship with them.
As far as the older generation. They typically are not on these sites, so they wouldn't be putting their information on Foursquare. To use the Amex deal on Foursquare, users have to manually link their card information. So, if they're not on Foursquare and don't link their card info, there would be no loss of security on the social media site.
Thought you might find this article from Forbes by Tom Groenfeldt. In it he states, "Banks are beginning to realize that communicating with customers over social networks doesn’t have to be public; they can carry on one-to-one exchanges of information."
http://www.forbes.com/sites/tomgroenfeldt/2012/01/30/social-media-can-reduce-card-fraud-and-over-active-card-blocking/2/
Thanks for the comment and hopefully I answers your questions!
Hi Tara,
ReplyDeleteInteresting topic. I am not a fan of Foursquare. I've never really liked it because it was invasive. Your friends can see where you were and when you were there. Of course, you choose to provide them with this information. Foursquare could probably form a partnership like the one with AmEx, with many different companies. Companies could increase consumer interest with a partnership like this. For instance, there are a great deal of local restaurants here in my city that provide incentives when you check in on Foursquare. Some offer appetizers or a percentage off on your total. These are the things that kind of make me want to join Foursquare. I am all about deals, free stuff and coupons. Actually, now that I think about it my credit union has something similar to the AmEx- Foursquare partnership. Each month, if I use my debit card at certain establishments like RedBox for instance, I get 5% cash back on all my purchases. This usually helps me pick one business over the other. I wonder if other companies have similar partnerships. I'm also curious to see how Foursquare could make a profit off a partnership like this.
Great post!
DeleteThanks for your comment and insight! I have been using Foursquare as a way to increase my Klout score and it's a "friendly" competition between my husband and I on who can rack up the most points. :)
I think the biggest ways Foursquare can make money from a partnership like the one with Amex is charging businesses for sponsored deals. Similar to what Twitter does with sponsored tweets. Here, businesses could "buy" an ad based on their target market. This would be a killer deal for the business because they could actually "tailor" a deal for a particular user. I found this article online that speaks idea.
http://www.quora.com/foursquare/How-does-foursquare-make-money-1
Regards,
Tara
This is from Tara:
ReplyDeleteHey, John:
First, thanks for your great comments!
The fall of online companies is definitely a risk when entering that space. However, I think social media platforms can learn from the mistakes of MySpace. As Michael Jones from Fortune Tech points out, "where Myspace came up short was on utility -- that is, we didn't have a product that compelled users to come to the site every day, something that had true-long lasting utility for consumers." (Link to the article below). I agree and I think Foursquare does provide a compelling offering to users because it's fun and engaging. Two important aspects for success on the social media front. If they continue to choose their partners well and keep up with the changing landscape of thir environment, they will have a bright future (in my humble opinion).
I didn't find anything detailing the particulars of the deal between Foursquare and Amex, so I cannot answer your question regarding partnership with other social media platforms. But, my guess would be that Amex is dictating that relationship and could probably do what it wanted. Foursquare needs them, not the other way around. :)
There is certainly a risk with any partnership, but particularly with financial institutions today. If Foursquare is methodical in selecting its partners, it could reap financial benefits and longevity for them. I believe this is why the partnership was successful…because they chose their partner wisely. I think it would be a complete dumbhead move to partner with Chase, B of A, etc. because there is still uncertainty as to their financial strength.
Here's that article from Tech Fortune.
http://tech.fortune.cnn.com/2011/10/24/mike-jones-myspace/
Thanks again for your comment, hope I answered your questions.
Take care,
Tara