Monday, September 24, 2012

Andrea Lavin, Popular Press Blog wk 2

Continental Airlines: "Go Forward Plan"

In1994, Continental Airlines was in serious trouble.  At that time, they had filed for chapter 11 bankruptcy twice, had a horrible reputation for their flights never being on time, for losing luggage and for giving dreadful service.  To make matters worse, they were facing huge debt.  The company made some major organizational changes starting with a brand new CEO, Gordon Bethune, who spear headed instrumental changes that made a historic comeback for the company. (Burkitt, 2010, para. 4)   Bethune created the “Go Forward Plan” which was focused on company morale and establishing trust and loyalty with customers.  (Burkitt, 2010, para. 4)   In an interview with Financial Times, Bethune reported that change was key in creating the turn around.  At the time of the interview, the company had reported record profits over 13 consecutive quarters.  Bethune said of his progress, “If you treat your staff well, they do their jobs properly.  Contented customers tell their friends and your profits rise.  The only way to have a good company is to have employees who enjoy working there everyday” (Skapinker, 1998, para 5).   


The CEO’s notions about employee satisfaction and a company’s profitability echo Maslow’s groundbreaking theory of motivation, which suggests that humans are motivated by a hierarchy of needs that are physiological, social and psychological.  According to Maslow's theory, for a human’s full growth and development, all needs must be met. (Moran, 1998).   In Images of Organization, Moran explains this theory “had powerful implications” because it indicated that the ideology of the time, which was to provide a wage and a steady job, was confining the worker to lower levels of development.  (Moran, 1998)  From this theory it was discovered that giving a worker conditions that allowed for personal growth could simultaneously help the company reach its goals.  (Moran, 1998)

Maslow's Hierarchy

At Continental, Bethune gave his employees cash rewards for the good performance. A Financial Times article in 1998 reported he offered a $65 bonus for every month Continental was in the top half of the US airlines punctuality table, in addition to the profit share for the company’s financial performance.  (Skapinker, 1998) Of the financial motivation Bethune said, “employees value cash”, and went on to say that offering employees shares alone is not as effective as cash. (Skapinker, 1998)  Bethune’s cash/bonus reward system, and it’s effectiveness over shares or stock, was identified in Designing Organizations That Are Built to Change, (Worley & Lawler, 2006).  Worley and Lawler explain, “In comparison to bonuses, stock plans are likely to be less effective in motivation change because the line of sight between the desired behavior and reward is less clear.” (Worley & Lawler, 2006) 



Bethune implemented some basic strategies that are in alignment with The Star Model framework: strategy, people, structure, rewards, and processes.  (Galbraith, 2011).  He would fly customers where they needed to go and offer cash incentives to his employees.  The money would come from an estimated $6 million a month that was being used to cover expenses such as money for hotel rooms and tickets on competing carriers, which were a direct result of late planes. (Townsend, 1998).  Punctuality improved rapidly, sick leave plummeted and staff was proud of their work.  (Skapinker, 1998)   


Bethune’s strategies delivered results.  In 1996 and 1997, Continental Airlines received the J.D. Power Award of customer satisfaction.  In July of 1998, Continental reported a record second quarter earning of $275 million, the highest in company history at the time. (Townsend, 1998)  Gordon Bethune retired from Continental Airlines in 2004.  His structural changes illustrate the star model in action, Maslow’s theory of motivation, and also depicts a successful large-scale effort for company change as discussed in Designing Organizations That Are Built to Change, Worley and Lawler (2006).   In their article they identify, what Bethune knew, that  “people have a market value; jobs do not.” (Worley & Lawler, 2006, p. 20)  



While reading this week’s assigned literature, I kept making mental notes of the ways the theories and ideas presented fit into my own work experience.  I have worked for both companies on each side of the “Mechanistic” and “Organic” management and organization scale, as described by Moran (2006). I was so inspired by the information presented, particularly the data on the correlation between work environments, employee moral, and the over all performance of the company, that I even considered emailing one of the articles to my former boss, just as an FYI.   I decided against it, but still wish this was required reading for CEO’s everywhere. 

References:
Burkitt, L. (2010, May 14).  Comeback Companies. Forbes Magazine.  Retrieved on September 23,         2012 from http://www.forbes.com/2010/05/13/apple-ford-hp-cisco-audi-adidas-cmo-network               comeback-companies_print.html

Galbraith., J.R. (2011). The Star Model, pp. 1-6

Galbraith, J.R. (2002). Designing Organizations, pp. 73-90

Morgan, G. (1998). Images of Organizations: Executive Edition, pp. 35-67

Skapinker, M. (1998, October 15).  Lifted by a change of atmosphere: Interview Gordon Bethune.           Financial Times, p. 12.

Townsend, A. (1998, October 22).  Continental Airlines; Boss Saved Airline.  Dayton Daily News,  p.       7B.

Worley, C. & Lawler, E. (2006). Designing Organizations that are built for change, MIT Sloan                  Management Review, 48(1), pp. 18-23

6 comments:

  1. Excellent topic Andrea! I have always felt that employees were the most important part of an organization. These are the people that actually do the work. They need to be kept happy. I agree with you that all CEOs should have to read the articles. I so value employee morale. I used to do events for the organization I previously worked for. The only problem was that it was just me. Nobody else seemed to understand why it was so important. After reading your post, I've decided my current peers could use some uplifting too. Thank you!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Continental recently merged with United Airlines. Using the star framework, what do you think are the big issues to consider for that organizational change?

    ReplyDelete
  3. In regards to the Star Model the issues they would need to consider are:

    Strategy: Sets the direction for the company. They will need to identify a mission and values for the newly formed corporation. The strategy will no doubt need to consider the strengths, weaknesses/ limitations, opportunities, and threats of the newly merged companies. They need to identify which services and markets are now overlapping and also have now opened up. The strategy will also identify how they will move forward in terms of marketing, and shared resources between the two companies, new territory opportunities, unforeseen problems or issues, and set a tone for company culture.

    Structure & Processes: This may be the most difficult part of implementation because most likely jobs will be eliminated and loyalty and trust of the employees could be lost or threatened. They will need to identify what positions of management will be needed. In doing so, they will find what positions need to be created or eliminated. Once the positions of power are identified they will need to figure out what departments will be created, eliminated, merged; identify departmental needs. Then they will need to develop policies and procedures in terms of function, products, workflow, and processes that will be make the most sense for the company to run smoothly.

    Rewards: To develop the rewards system the organization will need to consider the structure of the company. This is opportunity to implement new policies regarding salaries, bonuses, stock options, and other promotions.

    People: In my opinion, ideally they will need to merge their human resource policies or create something attractive and fair for the employees, and the newly acquired employees feel welcome. This is an opportunity for the newly formed organization to develop cross–functional teams within the structure and is key in setting the tone for the organization. They will also need to consider what new policies, training and development will be needed for the employees since now there are most likely going to be new departments, new areas of specialization, new procedures, etc.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Andrea, Loved your write up on Continental. My mother's cousin has worked there for over 20 years and I could see the relationship between Bethune's changes and his job satisfaction. It is true that Continental was up against the ropes a few years ago but Bethune turned them around and as Brad mentioned, they merged with United in March.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Andrea,

    It's good to know that Bethune was able to take Continental from "worst to first." I've only flown with them twice, both times to and/or from Hawaii. The first time was during the "worst" phase, when their planes were referred to as "cattle cars" due to the fact that they crammed as many seats into a plane as the law would allow. Having been stuck in a middle seat, I can certainly attest to feeling like part of a herd of cattle. And true to form, they did lose my luggage

    The second time was after Bethune had taken them to "first," although after that experience I would not say they were first with me. While I did notice the improvements mentioned in your post, my dissatisfaction stems from the fact that I never received credit for my flight in my frequent flyer account.

    Obviously, none of this has to do with this week's reading...it's just me venting! But you did a great job of tying everything to the reading in ways I would not have considered, such as applying Maslow's Hierarchy to Continental's employee rewards program.

    Great job!

    Kerry

    ReplyDelete