Sunday, November 11, 2012

Kerry's Week 9 Blog - Academic Article

Teamwork in the Technology Age

Richardson, P., & Denton, D. K. (2007). Using the intranet to build teamwork. Team Performance Management, 13(5/6), 184-188.

I thought this article tied into this week's reading because, among other things, it recognizes that many organizations allow employee teams to engage in self-directed work (which Levy showed us can lead to catastrophic results in his article about the Nut Island disaster). It also provides a useful strategy for how to prevent just such an occurrence by using the intranet to foster communication among team members and managers, a tip that could be very useful for the new managers described in Hill's article on managing teams.

It's a fact of life that teams have become an integral and indispensible part of modern organizations. However, many managers (especially new ones) do not yet have a good understanding of how to build a highly effective team. Instead of looking at the team as a whole, many managers still tend to focus on individual performance within a team which can result in more reasons not to cooperate with fellow employees than in motivation to work together. It is crucial to any team's success that there be a clear understanding of the organizational goal or vision towards which they are all working. There is also a fine line between allowing a team to work independently without constant supervision and letting them become so self-directed that they become isolated from management and lose sight of the bigger organizational picture. Richardson and Denton cite the need for a sense of common purpose, being clear about why the team's work is important, availability of relevant information, open communication, and producing significant results as being major success factors for any team. They further state that good team performance will always be difficult to achieve unless there is a system in place for both team members and managers to provide and analyze feedback on team performance.

Intranets provide an ideal solution for real-time feedback, which is essential to team building and management. Anything less than continuous real-time feedback, providing a constant flow of information to the team makes it difficult, if not impossible, for them to know that they are meeting expectations and staying focused on the big picture. This is where Richardson and Denton reference Levy's "nut island effect" as an extreme example of what can happen if a team does not have the constant flow of information to and from management. They assert that when used properly, the intranet provides a clearer picture of the true degree of teamwork of a group, rather than "some idealized managerial impression."

Until now, intranets have been used largely for sharing of information that an organization does not want shared with the outside world. Richardson and Denton maintain that it can also be a powerful collaborative tool.

2 comments:

  1. Hi Kerry!

    In my previous company they had begun implementing Share Point which was supposed to be our intranet but we were not happy about it. Nobody understood the program nor did we feel we needed it. It was terrible. Outside of the IT department, nobody was happy about SharePoint. In my current position though, I love our intranet. All my questions are answered there and the information is right at the tips of my fingers. I love it! I guess it depends on the type of company and how it is structured. I agree that if used properly, it can be quite effective.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Hi Kerry...
    I agree with the concept that managers need some sort of constant presence with their teams, perhaps not face-to-face but some sort of strategy where the teams feel their presence without being resentful of their presence. The Nut Island was an extreme example but part of the problem there was managers did not want to even be physically in the same place as those workers, so it really was their own little society.

    I can see the intranet being a workable idea but would each team member have to engage with it, or would they elect one member to do that. If that's the case, why not appoint one member to be the liaison with management?

    Best,
    John

    ReplyDelete